Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Reading Response #2

Reading Response #2 is due at the beginning of class on Wednesday, March 26th.  The assignment is to write an approximately 500-word essay on the following prompt:

What do you think best explains the seeming complexity, order, and functionality of natural objects and aspects of the universe? In other words, explain and evaluate the abductive version of the design argument for God's existence.
  • First, briefly explain the abductive version of the design argument. Describe the relevant evidence that needs to be explained. List the possible hypotheses that attempt to explain that evidence. And explain why proponents of the design argument believe that the intelligent designer hypothesis is the most plausible one.
  • Then, evaluate this argument. Is an intelligent designer the best explanation of this evidence? Or is another explanation better? Tell me your opinion. Do you think the abductive version of the design argument is a good argument or a bad argument? Why? Be sure to defend your opinion with reasons.
The response is based on the design argument section of the textbook (chapters 5, 6, and 7--especially the abduction section on pages 55-57 and chapter 6 on evolution and creationism) and on the discussions we have in class, particularly on October 16th.  Like the other reading responses, you won't be graded on your opinion. You'll be graded on how well you DEFEND your opinion.  Reading response #2 is word 50 points (5% of your overall grade).

Too Complex, Not Ordered Enough

No comments:

Post a Comment