Reading Response #2 is due at the beginning of class on Wednesday, March 26th. The assignment is to write an approximately 500-word essay on
the following prompt:
What do you think best explains the seeming complexity,
order, and functionality of natural objects and aspects of the
universe? In other words, explain and evaluate the abductive version of the design argument for God's existence.
- First, briefly explain the abductive version of the design
argument. Describe the relevant evidence that needs to be explained.
List the possible hypotheses that attempt to explain that evidence. And
explain why proponents of the design argument believe that the
intelligent designer hypothesis is the most plausible one.
- Then, evaluate this argument. Is an intelligent designer the best
explanation of this evidence? Or is another explanation better?
Tell me your opinion. Do you think the abductive version of the design
argument is a good argument or a bad argument? Why? Be sure to defend
your opinion with reasons.
The response is based on the design argument section
of the textbook
(chapters 5, 6, and 7--especially the abduction section on pages 55-57 and chapter 6 on evolution and creationism) and on the discussions we have in class, particularly
on October 16th. Like the other reading responses, you won't be graded
on your opinion. You'll be graded on how well you
DEFEND your opinion. Reading response #2 is word 50 points (5% of your overall grade).
No comments:
Post a Comment